I just wonder on what parameters and assumptions or the submissions such data were complied and published. A country gets popular through the people , the way it helps the tourist, the cost of living, the infrastructure, the development in systematic way which improves the living conditions. And all these should happen commensurate with the population growth. I strongly doubt all these parameters might not have been taken before deciding on India's rank which is relegated to 60 plus. I feel we have the best people, culture, hosting tourists in best way, travel and lodging cheaper and above all many places to see and cherish. India is also improving the living conditions of Afghanisthan, Burma, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. So what I feel that India should have been given the best rank taking all these things into consideration.
'Idhuvum Kadandhu Pogum "
Even this challenging situation would ease