Indian intelligentsia is either silent on or disapprove 'Bahubali' series. Why?They go ga-ga over Mughal-e-Azam. They talk non-stop about Pakeezah. They can't stop discussing Umrao Jaan. But Bahubali or Bahubali-2? They remain silent. Some of them diasapprove. They call the story unreal. They tell that these films talk about the Brahmin-Khshatriya upper-caste domination in ancient India! They desperately try to find faults of these two Bahubali series films.
But why? When they can praise unrealistic films like Mughal-e-Azam or badly made film Pakeezah, why they silently or violently oppose Bahubali series films? Is there any plausible answer?