Gold Member ISC
Hence evolution can be proved incorrect .
Such a small butterfly has this amazing capacity , so that would lead us to think of the creator who gave us all life .
'Idhuvum Kadandhu Pogum "
Even this challenging situation would ease
And who even said that evolution of man isn't in epics? Why are monkeys called vaanar in India ? Because they look like nar- man.
Greeks thought the same. Egyptians and Mayans revered them as gods and so did the Chinese. There is a saying in China, " Monkey is a smart person".
It is just the Abrahamic beliefs that are too stubborn to see the truth. And the rest of the world never saw monkeys, so the given examples are it.
Ancient man always thought of monkeys as a contemporary and a distant relative.
And Darwin's missing link was already found in 2009. That special species thoroughly connects the evolution in a line.
Darwin's theory is no longer just a theory. Its an inescapable truth.
The stronger a light shines the darker are the shadows around it.
I hope he would be taken whatsapp as correct and would have uttered these I believe. Nowadays people believe whatsapp messages more than anything else and that is why there are many pranks going around and one among them most interesting prank is all 1st of each month is Sunday and everybody without referring or checking the fact just forwarded the message.
Nice to be in ISC and feel the difference.
Darwin's theory of Natural Selection is the most widely acclaimed theory to prove how every organism has evolved from nature. In order to oppose this theory, you should have immense scientific reason to do so not by saying cock and bull stories. Even the ancestors of various geographical areas of the world believed this even before Darwin has proposed this theory. They believed that life form transferred from one being to another and nature just balances the life. When ancestors have such knowledge of understanding the deep roots of nature I don't know why these men do the contrary.
Dr. V. Shashikanth
I presume you can question or test a hypothesis that Darwin could be wrong but this would need plenty of the greatest scientist and historians in the world to even attempt this Just imagine the number of people laughing when they read this unconventional statement. The good thing is, now whenever someone googles' Charles Drawin and theory of evolutaion, this minister's name also would come up.
All we found is various ape fossils, and various man fossils; nothing showing the missing link. According to the long interval of time for this evolution, there should be so many stages of evolution found in the fossil records. Of all the fossils supposedly to be the one missing link, several are fakes and exposed as such, And still, there is one 'missing link' Lucy is still being taught in schools as fact.
According to evolution, there ought to be other in-between stages before the ape became established as a group. What was the previous version of the ape? For this also there is no fossil record. So scientifically Darwin's theory is nothing but a theory, even if very imaginative.
As for the many people in the scientific community opposing this, you can be sure that they will lose their jobs/sponsorships/grants if they oppose this theory. This aspect is proved especially in the western countries. They have been fired. This is fact.
It is definitely not 'politically correct' to speak against certain things. One of them is Darwin's theory.
There are some great scientific minds in institutions like ICR – Institute for Creation Research; AIG – Answers in Genesis; and others who use their own funding to do research have put out their detailed versions. (Don't go to Wikipedia but to their own sites).
In my own life I faced this in college exam. When asked to write about imperfections of geologic record, I wrote about the glaring gaps and inconsistencies taken from the various proponents of evolution. This was an open-ended question, and yet I was flunked because my answers were contrary to the brainwashing going on. I certainly enjoyed writing the truth even if it cost me half a year to repeat the course.
Satyapal Singh, a retired IPS Officer and a present MoS in present Central Government, may be one such person who doesn't believe anything without proper evidence. He could have acquired this habit during his long service period.
Non-violence is the greatest Dharma; So too is all righteous violence.
I was not expecting such statement from him. But, there might be a compulsion of the platform from where he said this. But I wonder he did not hear of Vishnu's Dashavtar from old people in his family. This depicts evolution of man from animals. I think he believes in adam and hauha (eve).
Evolution can be disproved by science itself. If they can't find basis to theories, they depend on circular reasoning to arrive at whatever results they needed. One break at one of these circular reasoning connections, and the whole theory tips over.
Besides the Christian, Muslim and Hebrew faiths, the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), otherwise known as the Hare Krishna movement also does not accept Darwin's theory.