Should a country have a cycle of democracy and military rule?Each form of government has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. There are countries with democracy well established (like India) and there are countries where military rule(some African Nations) exist.
In a democracy we enjoy the freedom of speech, action etc. Day to day work is civilized, decisions can be questioned, people are considered and represented by duly elected members to draft policies in the best interest of the people.
But, we have corruption, inequality, violence, scams, and unemployment. Every policy, rule etc takes time to be decided.
In a military rule, we lose the freedom of some basic rights, things move faster, there would be discipline, violence, and corruption would be dealt better.
So, like the best of both worlds, can a country have few years of military rule interspread between years of democracy?