|#53475 Author: Ashis Dubey Member Level: Gold Member Rank: 0 Date: 28/Jan/2009 Rating: Points: 2|
To separate is not a solution for everything.If all the issues are solved by getting separated from a state,then what is said to be unity in diversity?Then USA may also be called a country with unity in diversity.
I am confused about the motto of getting separated.What will they get if telangana get separated?
There will not be any advantages for a separated state.They just wanted to separate as they know that as long as there is one state,they will not win the elections.
So it is all politics but nothing.
Editor - Forums & Resources
|#54476 Author: ARVINDH Member Level: Gold Member Rank: 0 Date: 02/Feb/2009 Rating: Points: 1|
Andhra Pradesh is one of the biggest state in area. So the administration of a large area will lead to some difficulties.
Based on the above panaroma only our central government has splitted 3 states in 2000. So if separate state for telungana is formed then both the andhra pradesh and telungana will be benefited in all circumstances like receiving fund from the central government, getting industrial benefits and much more.
So we have to welcome this one.
|#54548 Author: RK Member Level: Gold Member Rank: 0 Date: 02/Feb/2009 Rating: Points: 2|
Separating Telangana Doesn't affect to Andhra Pradesh. But it affects much to Telangana. Other than Singareni coleries and some lime, dolomite mines there are not much natural resources in Telangana. Agriculture also not that much good in Telangana. Only few districts have water resouces. As a whole it will be difficult for them to self sustain.
Earlier formed 3 states have plenty of natural resources. Jharkand, Chattisgarh, Uttaranchal all three are very rich in natural and industrial resources. Where as Telangana is not self sufficient.
Only Hyderabad is there for Telangana, that's it.
RK - Some thing special
|#54573 Author: G.Praveen Kumar Member Level: Gold Member Rank: 0 Date: 02/Feb/2009 Rating: Points: 3|
India is country with many languages and different religions, and opinions of people are always respected in a secular state.If people insist for a separate state (Telangana) still they will be a part of India and are treated as One.
Simultaneously if Telangana forms all the funds and opporutnities will be directly recieved by individual state and certainly will help in development.
|#60752 Author: K Srinivasa Rao Member Level: Gold Member Rank: 0 Date: 23/Feb/2009 Rating: Points: 3|
My point of view, when Telangana separated from Andhra Predesh the Telangana people loss more.
They have no resource to develop.
Telangana will become like a Orissa State.
K. Srinivasa Rao
Community Owner - C Language Learners
K. Srinivasa Rao
|#61017 Author: radhakrishnamerugu Member Level: Silver Member Rank: 0 Date: 24/Feb/2009 Rating: Points: 2|
thelangaana is the very senstive matter and in that area back word people are there is thelgaana when it is separated not useful for thelangaana people
|#68658 Author: Mohd Munnawar Member Level: Silver Member Rank: 0 Date: 21/Mar/2009 Rating: Points: 6|
No word of thanks is enough to express our gratitude to those voters of the Lok Sabha and Assembly constituencies in the Telangana districts of Andhra Pradesh who in the recent byelections decisively rejected the Telangana Rashtra Samithi and the separatism that it stands for. It was almost a referendum, and people voted overwhelmingly to reject the separatist candidates.
Andhra Pradesh is a state which has made impressive progress since the 1956 reorganisation of states, which created a bigger state of Andhra Pradesh by merging the original Andhra (the Telugu-speaking districts of the undivided Madras Presidency) and the eight Telugu-speaking districts of the former Nizam’s dominions of Hyderabad. It may be recalled that the reorganisation of states in 1956 had abolished the Nizam’s Hyderabad by merging its Marathi-speaking districts with Maharashtra, Kannada-speaking districts with Karnataka and Telugu-speaking districts with Andhra Pradesh.
While both the Marathi-speaking districts and Kannada-speaking districts accepted the new order gracefully, some sections in the eight Telugu-speaking districts, earlier called the Telangana area, have been intermittently demanding a separate state of Telangana by dividing Andhra Pradesh. This demand somehow received support from some national parties in the last General elections, and this resulted in the strengthening of the agitation for separate Telangana. The Telangana Rashtra Samithi joined the UPA government at the Centre and formed part of the government. The failure of the UPA government to concede their demand for a separate state led to their protest resignation last year, and thus necessitated these byelections, when they appealed to the people on the issue of a separate state of Telangana. The result has been a decisive "no" from the people. Clearly, the majority of the people of these eight Telangana districts see much merit in remaining part of Andhra Pradesh and do not fancy the idea of a separate Telangana state.
On no economic ground can Telangana be justified. The city of Hyderabad has benefited enormously from being the capital of an enlarged Andhra Pradesh. The wealthier sections from coastal Andhra Pradesh have invested substantially in Hyderabad city, resulting in a prosperity which everyone can see. It is only a tiny minority which does not appreciate that the stopping of the steady flow of resources from coastal Andhra Pradesh to Hyderabad and the other districts in the Telangana area, which do not have much physical resources, will make Hyderabad suffer immensely. In the last few years it has become one of the new metropolitan cities of the country. It has one of the best international airports in India, and is also a major hub of railway traffic in the South. Interestingly, it is the only city outside the four metros where the United States is opening a consulate, thereby indicating how important it is in US perception. Earlier Iran had also opened a consulate there.
Hyderabad has become the focal point of high-tech industries and a number of other industries like drugs and pharmaceuticals. All this might come to a halt if a separate Telangana state is created. It will benefit only a small class of Telangana politicians who are hoping to gain minister ships in the new state. But for ordinary people, whether in coastal Andhra or in the Telangana areas, the creation of a separate Telangana can only be a retrograde development.
The time has, therefore, come when the Centre should formally turn down the demand for a separate Telangana state. The people of Telangana have given enough grounds by their recent voting behaviour. This amply indicates that while some of them might still outwardly make noises for Telangana for some time to come; in their heart of hearts they know that it is neither possible nor desirable. There is a saying in Canada that a separate country of French-speaking Canada is neither possible nor desirable, but French-Canadians would like to keep this matter alive in order to gain maximum political advantage. Hopefully, the situation vis-à-vis Telangana can be compared to this.
Except for Haryana, the creation of smaller states like Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand has not been an unmixed blessing. With a much smaller number of MLAs to manage, these states have become easy grounds for horse-trading and manipulation, resulting in prolonged political uncertainty. Often political changes can be brought about by managing a handful of MLAs with money power and muscle power. This also affects economic growth. If a separate Telangana comes up, there is every likelihood of such a scenario being repeated. All right-thinking people in Andhra Pradesh and elsewhere should, therefore, resist this. Just because a small but vocal minority shout for smaller states like Telangana, Gorkhaland or Vidarbha, there is no reason to support such demands, ignoring the long-term political and economic interests of the nation. They should be treated with the contempt they deserve. Nor is there any case for constituting a second States Re organization Commission.
Thanks & Regards,
Mohd Munawar |Sourcing Tips|
|#69253 Author: K Ramana Member Level: Bronze Member Rank: 0 Date: 23/Mar/2009 Rating: Points: 3|
It will not help neither telangana people nor the Andhra People. I always wonder why can't the politicans do development in Telangana without spliting it from Andhra Pradesh.
The CM of Chhattisgarh recently in media said that spliting from major state was mistake. The state's development is same as before nothing is changed.. So, it is better that Telangana remains in Andhra Pradesh and people do not fall to false promises given by different political parties...
|#71369 Author: Dr Sachine (Eye Retina Surgeon) Member Level: Gold Member Rank: 0 Date: 30/Mar/2009 Rating: Points: 3|
If every state starts getting divided in smaller states, it is not good for the national integrity. Telangana people themselves don't want a separate state as staying as a part of Andhra Pradesh is much more beneficial considering the progress. Telangana doesn't have adequate natural resources.