So, you are saying this was an encounter. Something which the Government has categorically denied. If you say that this was an encounter, then it must be true. You must know because you always seem to have inside information which others are unaware of. So, who is lying? You or the authorities?
Nevertheless, what a damning statement. This information should hit national headlines.
And, for once I believe you. Although, the question is, who ordered the encounters? By law, the police are not supposed to kill people in encounters, where the victim is unarmed. It is an offence. But you corroborate the theory that the "liberal intelligentsia" is claiming. So, for once you are on the right track!
You are also justifying encounters. The killing of an unarmed person, without provocation is equal to war crimes. I would like you to provide Instances illustrating encounters happening in almost every country. Don't shoot in the dark - come-out with a proof.
The widow is an intelligent and confident woman. She, fought her case well, despite her personal grief. She made sure she got what she wanted - all her demands were accepted. It was the media that had helped her. The so-called liberal intelligentsia stood by her and an embarrassed, red-faced establishment had to buckle under pressure. The cops had done everything in their power, to quash the case. Had the liberal intelligentsia not stood by her, she'd still be fighting a lone battle. The interviews that were televised on national television had shown the real anguish and anger of the lady.
How do you know that the liberal intelligentsia is disheartened? Have they gone public with an announcement to that effect? Please tell, let's become gossip mongers.
"A love affair with knowledge will never end in heartbreak." -Michael Garrett Marino