Why controversies remain controversial for a long time?At times, we participate in debates and discussions and all the debates telecasted through different television channels have a large number of viewers. We all are unique and must have our own opinions and that is what we see in debates. In ISC too group discussions take place from time to time and in many threads we discuss certain important topics. Sometimes there are heated exchanges between members and the discussion remains inconclusive.
Now, do we always discuss things to come to a conclusion or just to share each other's view on a particular issue? We have limitations because we are guided by the constitution of the country and it needs a lot of political willpower to amend laws or to enact new laws to make unjustified acts illegal. There are certain controversies too related to many issues and it remains controversial for a long time even if laws are enacted to justify certain things. Why few things always remain controversial? Is it because people act on those issues just from their core beliefs that has no logic or is it because people do not want to be bounded by laws to come to a conclusion on those issues? Members, what are your views?