Knowledge is power.
Presently India has maintained good diplomatic relationship with majority of the Countries. Once China was considered as dead enemy of India. But now the diplomatic relationship has improved drastically. I am sure the credit should go to Mr. Narendra Modi for his efforts in extending his hands of friendship with other Countries.
The intelligence agencies also pay vital role in advising the Government. They provide intelligence inputs to the Government in preparing the foreign policy of the Country.
"If you don’t understand my silence, you will not understand my words"
The author's comment is a popular notion but is not fully correct.
'Nayak nahin; Khalnayak hoon main' (I am not the hero; I am the villain)
To ensure smooth functioning and interaction between departments within one nation and departments of various nations, we have well established agencies for a particular (or a group of) issue or aspect of society.
Unfortunately, these organisation are so wrapped up in their own world that they forget the very reason for their existence. Apart from this politics, safeguarding one's own turf or job often takes a higher priority over genuine issues. Also funding issues, inability to adapt with changing geo-political equations also adversely affect the functioning of agencies. As far as nexus is considered, yes it happens, at insecure times, at times when agencies have to save their own future.
What we need is a proactive attitude of the people at the highest level to look into such nexus within a country or between nations. This may not be easy but with a firm hand and collective inputs of experts in the respective fields, governments can formulate or introduce changes or amendments to re-align/re-shuffle the ailing departments and close the loopholes that promotes the nexus.
Since ancient times we have fought for Territory, Trade imbalances, cultural differences, faith and Ideological considerations. And also friends and enemies remain so for longer period unless a change in equation happens abruptly. But since last 200 years with the evolution of separate diplomatic studies and professionals and relevant personal we find enmity for virtual reasons. It is not that diplomats where not present in ancient times. But the diplomats were also part of Governance systems in their country so that they are able to understand what their country needs and framed policies as such.
Let us take few examples.
1st Afghan war 1839-42.
British India spent nearly 15 million pounds to wage war in Afghanistan because of a fictions threat of Russia which never was there. 40,000 troops perished and Lakhs of Afghan people for no purpose. This was a time when Bengal was crying under famine with deaths. Neither British nor Indians nor Russians or Afghans gained anything from it.
Cold War 1945-Present.
The erstwhile allies who fought hand in hand in 2nd World War with no territorial disputes or trade dispute bought into a complex war where no bullet was fired directly but devastated the whole world and changed Geo Politics with full of mistrust. Russians fell in 1991, US virtual retreat from Afghanistan, Numerous troops lost. These two powers had the ability to bring millions out of poverty if had good diplomatic relationship but failed.
China India rivalry, Russo Chinese split and even Indo Pak rivalry to a large extent is revolved around debates of realism. neo liberalism which are foreign policy terms. The diplomats live a separate world in themselves.
The problem is real
The worst was in 2016 India was importing lakhs tonnes of pulses through Government to Government channels heavily influenced by diplomatic cables when domestic production was 3 year high. Do diplomats go in tandem with domestic policy ?
In addition to the personal ambitions responsible for the problem as pointed by Umesh I think the problem is systemic as said by Natarajan. The suggestion given by respective members is also on the right path.
The problem is what type of Institutions we can build for the solutions suggested by them.