Sun, your title suggests a huge flaw on the part of ISC while the fact is that there are just five threads that are in pending status. Of these, one thread each is from January, February, May and two (including your recent thread) from June. While one need not spend much time to understand that your concern about threads in pending status has arisen since your thread has been shifted to pending, it is felt that we need not give undue importance to the same. If an author has some issue or needs some clarification when a thread of his is shifted, he can very well raise a thread and we may do the needful if felt necessary. Let us not make a mountain out of a molehill. When there are so many approved threads that go without/ or just a few responses, I feel we (other than the authors, if required)) need not be so bothered about the pending threads.
As has been mentioned by others, your thread has been shifted to pending and the reason has been specifically mentioned. I am not sure how you missed that vital point.
Please note that alerts for some sections are not working due to some technical snag and is being looked into. Following one's thread is an available and better option.
'It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it'. -Aristotle