Returned from today's hectic training and examination. Now, I have seen the responses/reactions, but I am not at all astonished. Let me try to reply to the responses one by one.
1. " There is much more behind the desecration."------Definitely yes. But desecration of the temple is a fact. It is the truth.
2. "Please stop spreading hatred, ISC is not the right place."-------Thanks for the advice. But did you give the same advice to the Member who raised a thread on the lynching of Tabrez Ansari but not on the lynching of Bharat Yadav (selective outrage). Did you advise him not to spread hatred? Or, as per your interpretation, mentioning the torture and persecution of Hindus is spreading hatred? What do you want? Do you want to put these atrocities against the Hindus under the carpet?
3. "@Saji, a suggestion, there is no point getting in a direct discussion with extremist mentalities. Just counter their hate and fear mongering with truths and let the sane minds decide."-------What a suggestion! Those who desecrated the temple are not of extremist mentalities, those who mention the facts have the extremist mentalities. This is the height of liberalism. And truths! Desecration of temple in Delhi, the capital of the country, by the scared people is the truth.
4. (a) "To accomplish their mission, they can even go to the extent of fudging facts. These are the people who spread fake news, create a communal divide, instigate violence. They should be charged for spreading untruths - isn't there a law for this? "----Who created a communal divide, who spread the untruth? Those who attacked the temple or those who reported the fact? Of course, those who reported the fact!
4.(b) "The newspaper says 200 people reached the police station the author invented a new figure of 1000 people. That is five times more than the actual numbers. The news is fake.
The newspaper says they rose slogans. The author has provided specific details of those slogans. "----Yes, the particular news-item stated that only 20-25 people went to Gupta's residence. But in yesterday's (2/7/2019) discussion at Times Now TV, it was reported that around a hundred people entered Gupta's residence. It was also stated that around a thousand people attacked the temple with specific religious slogans. Please listen to the comment/speech of Ms. Subhrashtha. And no one objected to these figures. I have quoted those figures. Further, where and when did I state that a thousand of people went to the police station. Please read the thread again. I have not edited it till now.
A relevant link which states that an AAP MLA was with the people who attacked the temple: https://www.opindia.com/2019/07/delhi-temple-attack-witness-says-aap-mla-imran-hussain-joined-the-mob-and-did-not-stop-attacks-on-temple/
(My response is not yet complete. Please wait for the next part.)
"Khamosh rahoon toh mushqil hai; Keh doon toh shiquayat hoti hain" (It is difficult to remain silent; But when I open up, they start complaining.)