Tantalization and us(Being inspired by great satirist Sampat Saral I wrote it)
Two type of talks exist, one is the talk of heart and second is the talk of work but both talks contradict each other. They can't be found on the same platform at the same time due to interpersonal indifference. In other words where is the talk of heart there is no talk of work, similarly where is the talk of work there is no talk of heart.
The talk of work is known to the masses because of its benefits for them whereas the talk of heart requires propaganda and publicity to be known to the folk. The talk of heart being hollow focuses on self acclaimation and forced admiration from the audience but on the other side the talk of work being substantive aims at happiness and satisfaction of the audience only.
The talk of heart rhetorically guides the thirsty people to rush towards the well to quench their thirst but when they reach there they find the well has dried up and as usual they begin to blame others why they did not hie towards the well apace but their dismay is removed at once by another adhortatory that they should rush back home and arrange the water themselves for themselves and others as well and the people being in hypnopomic state are highly pleased to listen such allocution.
The talk of heart is an art and science which easily gorgonize the people this is why it's listened attentively whereas the talk of work is voiceless.
But now wind is blowing in opposite direction where what's wrong is right and vice versa, so I'd better confess that I'm wrong and they are right who say that the talk of heart is the very talk of work per se,therefore, mutatis mutandis is the only way to protect myself from their wild rage.