Political leaders raise useless issues to divide us. We are the common people we should realize what responsibilities we have as a voter. We should focus on issues of development, employment, price hike, improvement in the living standard of people, eradication of poverty. Some politicians are great and good. One more thing is that we shouldn't vote for criminals and corrupt politicians.
No life without Sun
A doctor's son can be a doctor. A lawyer's son can be a lawyer. A teacher's son can be a teacher. But in society, we have so many doctors, lawyers and teachers. But for a party, there will be only one president and he should be capable to lead the party. Otherwise, the party will sink. What I like to say is a politician's son can become a politician. But a party president's son can't be nominated as president unless otherwise, he is having the capability to lead the party.
A deserving person should not be denied a post as he happened to be the son of the party president. At the same time, an undeserved person can't be made the party president as he belongs to a family. That will be bad for the progress of the party.
Anyone can contest elections and fulfil one's desire to be a politician after completing the basic formalities to get into politics. Family members can create a political party and father can raise his son to contest elections but it is the people who decide who is going to the minister. They can reject or accept the person as a political leader. It is people who make it or break it.
K Mohan @ Moga
'Idhuvum Kadandhu Pogum "
Even this challenging situation would ease
arity begins at home they say. Many children are scolded and chided by parents saying ' you are not useful to home, then how can you be useful for the world'. So such politicians really believe that development and progress has to start from one's own home. The development and progress will thus evolve and expand first from home, then to the local town, then to district, State and Nation.
After all, a doctor can make his/her son/daughter a doctor, an advocate's son/daughter can become advocate,a teacher's children can become teachers, a musician's children can become musicians. No one objects. But when it comes to politics why people question it as family politics ?
Such politicians have a readymade answer- people have accepted them.
Similarly a wife can takeover husband's business and inherit assets. Same is extended to political business and assets too. In a democracy all those are permitted and perfectly legal.The mistake is in the beholder eye!!!
Isn't it so?