Sun, as usual, it appears that you are more perturbed than the author due to the deletion of the thread. You need not be, should you? I feel it would be better if you leave after having your say. Why are you insisting on trying to prove your point? Not fair.
Arafatuzzafar, to be frank, there is actually nothing wrong with the topic that you brought up for discussion. But it is the way you have developed your content, the tone of your expressions and a few words (in the context it has been used) that you have used that is not acceptable. We would have let the topic be discussed if you had put it up in a better way so as to suit the requirements of our site. Just go through the thread once again and think how it would have been if it was presented in a more polished manner and you will realize.
For the consumption of all, let me reiterate that we do not delete threads blindly or for the sake of it. Our aim is to allow as many threads as possible, particularly those dealing with fresh and unique topics, but we are left with no choice at times because the contents, in some cases, are so constructed that it would not be possible to edit and tune such threads to bring it within our guidelines while keeping the idea of the author intact.
Dr Rao, we do give reasons as and when required but when the reasons are explicit and can easily be understood by our experienced authors, I don't see any requirement for providing an explanation. Even otherwise, the Webmaster had already clarified on an earlier occasion that editors are not bound to provide explanations though we do try our best to stand up to the expectations of our contributors and clear their doubts to the best of our ability.
Arafatuzzafar, you may bring up the topic again with a different title and contents if you wish to, provided, the guidelines are followed.
'Mastering others is strength. Mastering yourself is true power'. -Lao Tzu
