Are we trying to avoid debates and arguments here?When I first joined ISC people used to have debates over the topics and have disagreements and conflicts regarding the topics. But now, what I am observing is that people just concur with the author's viewpoint, support and show agreement on the particular topic even if, at times, it sounds absurd.
Are we trying to avoid debates and arguments? Isn't discussion supposed to have both positive and negative points, agreements, disagreements and arguments?
Are we also trying to be like our government with one-sided power and no opposition left to argue?