There are thousands of volunteer editors who are improving Wikipedia and today it has become the number one reference source in the internet. Anyone can become editor there. But when you edit and submit something then there are volunteering moderators who will reject your post until unless it is perfect and correct and you mention the source of information. Is not it amazing that such a big portal is just surviving on the work of volunteer editors?
So many times we work just for our reputation and recognition also but most of the times we work for earning money.
Knowledge is power.
Once the person has enough money to carry on, his attention will go for fame. Then he will think about how to get recognised in a crowd. He will spend some time if he thinks that he will get some recognition. There is another set of people who never bother about money or fame. They manage their life and try to help others to their possible extent without expecting anything in return. Such people may try to help others.
These days we see a trend. Rich people will get recognised fast and they will become the centre of attraction in any gathering. So ultimately if we aim to become rich we may get fame also.
"Life is easier when you enjoy what you do"
'Idhuvum Kadandhu Pogum "
Even this challenging situation would ease
Believe in the existence of God the superpower.
There are people who may not be categorised as money hankering people but they have the passion to display their best creations winning applications from the people for one's devotion. They are really the gems proving best outputs regardless of money.