Category: Admissions

31 Oct 2023 10:50

Joined:	10/12/2016
Level:	Diamond
Points:	109183

Points:	5

Two MBBS aspirants granted temporary admission by HC

Recently National Medical Commission (NMC) had cancelled the admission of 141 students in the final stray vacancy round of MBBS admissions in Maharashtra state. It is mentioned that NMC did this because state government was not abiding by its directive to conduct the admission process in a centralised online mode and instead was doing it at the institute level.
These two students approached the Nagpur bench of High Court and court gave them relief by giving order that their admission should be temporary accepted. Court also observed that there was no clarity in the matter and the involved parties should sit together and resolve the issue.
Generally students will not go to court for everything but in this case these two students approached court and got relief. What are your observations?

#775622

31 Oct 2023 11:28

Joined:	25/11/2014
Level:	Diamond
Points:	43273

Points:	4

It was ultimately the question of the careers of the students and they approached the court to get a clear cut guideline. This was necessary because it was related to their medical profession. Fortunately, they get the justice from the High Court. The judgement would not have been issued without their approach.
So we can say that it was the daring step of the two. Sitting ideally in such a case could mean the career loss of the two students. With their approach to the High Court, at least the judgement came in their favour.

#775632

31 Oct 2023 19:29

Joined:	02/06/2009
Level:	Diamond
Points:	145329

Points:	5

These days courts are only coming to the rescue of people. Political leaders who are in power are making their strategies and behaving as they like causing inconvenience to the people. This case is a clear example of a lack of understanding between central and state governments. As a matter of fact, before giving admissions the state government might have had a discussion with the concerned in the central government and clarified their stand so that there would not be any gap between them. When the central government has given some directions, the state government should have followed the same. If they differ, they should take up the matter with the central government and come to an understanding. Instead doing as they like caused the problem. An academic year is very valuable to a student and it is the responsibility of the government to see that these people will not be under confusion because of their methods and approaches, I feel. The court has come to the rescue of the students.

drrao
always confident

#775671

03 Nov 2023 16:38

Joined:	25/11/2014
Level:	Diamond
Points:	43273

Points:	4

Whenever there is the question of dislocation of the careers of the students, every step has to be taken by the authorities to ensure that the students should not suffer due to the ambiguity of the situations. After all, every year in the student's life is the important and loosing their careers for no faults of them would ultimately make them frustrated and demotivated.
The overall impact of such a negligent attitude could make the students derailed mentally and this could affect the entire families of the affected students. The long term effects must be evaluated before taking any harsh action.

Two MBBS aspirants granted temporary admission by HC

About IndiaStudyChannel.com

GENERAL

STUDY ABROAD

EDUCATION