I am happy with this Supreme Court judgment
In 1985, the Shah Bano judgment by the Supreme Court marked a significant decision in India, highlighting the relationship between secular state principles and individual constitutional rights within religious contexts. Following the judgment, the Rajiv Gandhi Government enacted the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, specifying maintenance provisions for divorced Muslim women. Section 3 of the Act limited maintenance to the 'iddat' period and stipulated payment of 'mahr' to the divorced Muslim women.The Act faced constitutional challenges, arguing violations of Articles 14, 15, and 21. On 10th July, 2024, the Supreme Court has ruled that Muslim women can seek maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) as well as the 1986 Act. Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih has now upheld that Section 125 applies to all married women, including Muslim women. They have emphasized that divorced Muslim women can choose remedies under either or both laws.
The apex court has now clarified that even if a husband fulfills obligations under the 1986 Act, a divorced Muslim woman can still invoke Section 125 of CrPC, if unable to maintain herself. Additionally, in cases of illegal divorce under the 2019 Act, which bans triple talaq, women can seek relief under Section 5 or Section 125. The judgment has emphasized maintenance as a social justice measure, asserting gender equality.
The members who want to study the judgment of Supreme Court, can use the following link: https://webapi.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2024/3533/3533_2024_11_1501_53688_Judgement_10-Jul-2024.pdf
------------------
This epoch-making judgment to safeguard the interest of divorced Muslim women has made me happy.