You must Sign In to post a response.
  • Category: Central Government

    Unemployment Among Youth in India: A Deeper Look

    According to various sources, including the Press Information Bureau (PIB), the unemployment rate among India's youth hovers around 10%. In simple terms, this means that out of every 100 individuals aged 15 to 29, around 10 remain unemployed. These numbers are estimated through the Periodic Labour Force Surveys (PLFS), conducted separately for urban and rural areas.

    However, a critical question arises: how reliable are these surveys, and what is their exact methodology? The reality is PLFS (started in 2017) is a faster way of estimating the rates but can be highly inaccurate and biased. Even former RBI Governor Duvvuri Subbarao (2008–2013) remarked:
    "Unemployment is one of our big challenges and I don't believe the government data reflects the true ground situation."

    That said, no country in the world has a perfectly robust system to measure unemployment. So let's assume, for a moment, that this data is accurate. Even then, the real question remains: how many of these "employed" individuals are actually contributing meaningfully to the Indian economy?

    The Economic Reality Behind Employment :

    To answer this, we need to look at a few key statistics:

    1. Average monthly per capita income is about Rs. 16,500.

    2. In 2022–23, the top 10% earned Rs. 13.53 lakh annually, while the bottom 50% earned just Rs. 71,163 annually.

    3. On average, a rural person earns less than Rs. 35,000 per year.

    4. 81.35 crore people (about 55.7% of the population) are beneficiaries of government food security schemes like PMGKAY, which provides free food grains for basic survival.

    Although these figures are not exclusively youth-related, they paint a clear picture: a significant share of India's workforce is engaged in low-quality, low-paying jobs.

    Many are technically employed, but their incomes are so low that they still rely on government schemes for basic needs like rice, wheat, and pulses. This means their spending power is negligible, and they have little to no disposable income for investment or consumption.

    Why the Employment "Success" Rings Hollow:

    More than half of India's population is below the poverty line in practice, if not in official terms.

    Even after being employed, a large portion of workers lack economic security and dignity in work.

    Income inequality is stark: while a small elite accumulates wealth rapidly, the majority struggle for survival.

    India is often described as an agricultural economy, yet farmers continue to die by suicide every year. The government's response usually comes in the form of loan waivers, which provide short-term relief but hurt the broader economy and fail to solve structural problems.

    After more than 75 years of independence, India still lacks a robust mechanism to deploy its massive workforce productively and raise overall social standards. The manufacturing sector, which could absorb large numbers of workers, remains underdeveloped. But the challenge is that building such capacity requires time—something the fast-changing technological world does not easily allow.

    Have We Missed the Bus?

    This leads us to a difficult question: has India already missed the bus, leaving its young population with no real hope?

    The answer is not simple. The challenges are enormous, and solutions will not come overnight. But one thing is clear: celebrating employment numbers without addressing the quality of jobs, income inequality, and economic security is misplaced optimism.
  • #783359
    Yes, we missed the bus. Unemployment is not new to India; it has been a persistent issue since Indra Gandhi's time. Once the Software Industry was introduced, thanks to Western countries, the Unemployment problem has reduced somewhat. Building on your above comments, the per capita income of a person is low when total wealth is divided by population. Therefore, they divided the people into 5 classes. One extreme is the rich in the world, rich people, the Middle class (salaried employees), and the poor and below the poverty line. So they are mainly playing (concentrating) with the first two classes, and the Middle class is a salaried employee, the rest are lottery for food.
    Based on the situation, humans in the society should follow an abelian group (Closure, Associative, Identity, Inverse, and Commutative)-- Bhushan

  • #783360
    That is why you see a lot of gap between the Poor and the Rich. They add some colour or spice, for that is corruption. But the Original thing is, if you add India's wealth / the total population average income is very low, so they divide the classes.
    Based on the situation, humans in the society should follow an abelian group (Closure, Associative, Identity, Inverse, and Commutative)-- Bhushan


  • Sign In to post your comments